As a teacher I have many opinions regarding the Common Core and its corresponding student and teacher assessments. I will begin this entry by stating that politics will undoubtedly be discussed due to how tightly CC is woven into it. I will also state that as an experienced and well-versed teacher I am utterly and completely against the new standards as well as the assessments. I will do my very best to state facts to support my opposition while also attempting to demystify the subject. I tell you all this now in an effort to forewarn you that I am incredibly passionate about this and to provide you the opportunity to discontinue reading. If this type of entry isn't your cup of tea then simply enjoy the image of my beautiful girls ready to kick the ass of the politicians sitting behind a desk attempting to dictate their future. If you are interested in learning the danger of CC and the high stakes testing then please read on.
There was time when I was strictly a numbers girl. Numbers are safe and concrete. When my daughter was going to born with complications I remember the question I kept asking the doctors was, "What are the chances...?" They always gave me a general qualitative response, which is I why I would ask my question again. A qualitative answer didn't feel safe. It didn't provide me a matter a fact statement that my daughter would have exactly this much of a percentage to live her life with out more surgery. There was no given ratio on how likely she was going to live complication free. I needed a number and I needed that number to be in my favor.
I found the same to be true when I was teaching. I taught in a life skills, language-based classroom that primarily consisted of children diagnosed on the autism spectrum. My students often had goals to reduce, what most called, maladaptive behaviors. Again, parents most often wanted to see a number. I cannot generalize and say that they did not want to understand the themes in their child's behavior, but generally the goal, especially with an IEP, was to analyze data through numerical comparisons. I can see now how this gave them a sense of hope when the numbers fell in the direction of their child's favor...and how it was devastating when they fell out of favor.
So what is the point of discussing numbers when I prefaced this entry to be centered around CC? Our children across the country are becoming nothing more than a number to politicians who want our numbers to surpass other country's numbers. I am not disregarding the importance of statistical analysis. It plays a very important role in research and development. There are some situations, however, in which qualitative measurements are extremely important. I would say that our children, developmentally appropriate standards, and effective evaluation to guide further instruction are some of them. The problem is this. Federal government wants national control over educational standards and assessments as proven through Bush's No Child Left Behind Act and Obama's Race To The Top. The difficulty is collecting, maintaining, and analyzing valid and reliable data with their proposed methods of evaluation. The repercussions of this method? There is no insight into it. It does not measure the complexity of the educational process. Numbers don't tell you that the the little boy who just failed his test has severe anxiety taking written exams. Numbers don't tell you that the little girl who slept through her test lay in bed the night before listening to her mommy and daddy scream and fight while her baby sister lay in her crib crying. Numbers don't tell you that Johnny couldn't concentrate on his test because his tummy was growling. His daddy left his mommy a year ago and she didn't have enough money to feed him the past week. You cannot rate a child without first investigating the preexisting conditions. There is a considerable body of research documenting that children in disadvantaged homes do not perform as well in school. Regardless, politicians-not educators-have unremittingly ignored the data. The have also ignored the fact that the kids who need the most (food, shelter, emotional support, and stability), have the least school funding (after school programs, art/music/phys ed programs, books, teaching materials, support specialists, smaller student-to-teacher ratios).
Now lets say the government just can't get over themselves. They absolutely NEED to implement some other form of student assessment. What would make sense? A growth model. Giving the states (ahemmm, minus Cuomo) and the districts back their control. Allowing them to do their job. Listening to teachers, administrators, cognitive psychologists, and neuroscientists in the field who do have the insight while taking into account socioeconimic data. Those numbers NEED to come from a growth model and NOT a high stakes standardized test on developmentally inappropriate standards. Not only are our children being given standardized tests to evaluate their own performance, they are now also being given MORE written tests to assess their teachers performance (included in the APPR)! Call me crazy but it seems that schools have not been failing children, rather politicians have been failing to address the changes in society (such as the decreased size of the middle class) which, therefore, has a direct affect on student academic achievement.
As I think of what I originally wanted to include in this post, I am finding that it is too much for one post. In addition to the aforementioned my thoughts were to also inform you of cognitive psychology, neuroscience, theory of learning, developmental milestones and how they play a role in setting appropriate learning standards and forms of assessment. However, it seems more fitting to next discuss the dangers of over testing at a young age. And, YES, it has been proven that non-authentic assessments at the early stages of education are in fact detrimental. I have heard all too often that "Well, this is what happens. People take tests." My response..."No. Adults take tests. Children explore, manipulate, play, and create to form ideas and then restructure those ideas so one day they will be capable of withstanding such mundane tasks such as week long exams."
In an effort to shorten this I think it best to leave you with the prior information and follow up with the effects of over testing and how imperative appropriate standards are in another entry. For now if you want to fight this war with me I leave you with this. OPT OUT. Teachers and districts have their hands tied, especially in NYS because they are worried about losing their jobs. The only people who can really take this over is parents. Opt out your children from the state assessments and the APPR's. I will discuss exactly what the APPR's are in the next post as well as how my daughter in kindergarten was affected by it. In the meantime deny the data that is used to label your child and fire his teacher and close his school. Refuse the tests. Certain districts are unsupportive of this and may very well tell you that you can not do this. Do your research and you will find out that yes you can! Legally, you can! As for me? The school, the district, even the state, can try and push me. But when it come to my girls, their education, their future, and their happiness if you push on me...I'm gonna push back harder.
P.S. Don't forget to share and tag this post if you like it